Pregnant Wife Left Country Won't Let Me See Baby
(Natural News) A shocking new written report published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when significant women are given covid vaccinations during their beginning or second trimesters, they endure an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing four out of 5 unborn babies.
This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the data published in a new written report entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Just equally agonizing as the data is the fact that the report authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth well-nigh vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.
Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News commodity, nosotros checked with our own science contacts to review the information and double bank check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:
- Yep, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
- Aye, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and fabricated a glaring fault that brings into question their credibility.
In other words, this report was almost certainly a cover-up to endeavor to claim vaccinating meaning women is perfectly safe. But the study data actually prove quite the oppose.
Here's how:
700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the 3rd trimester
Table 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a full of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their tertiary trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their start or second trimesters. (You lot have to read the fine print below the table to run into this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred earlier their pregnancies hit the 20-calendar week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the table.
In uncomplicated math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known every bit "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could non have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, past definition.
Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" adding, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or 2nd trimesters.
Put another manner, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the beginning fourth dimension during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the showtime 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.
The authors of this report should receive an honor in the category of, "How to prevarication with statistics," considering they evidently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand flim-flam to go far appear that vaccines are prophylactic for significant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the beginning 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set up. (Information technology'due south a pocket-sized gear up of 127 pregnant women, then we'd similar to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more than clear picture.)
Apples and oranges, lemons and limes
A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science study asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are xanthous?" The scientists count all the yellowish fruit and accomplish the number l. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 considering there are 100 total piece of fruit, and then they declare, "50% of lemons are xanthous" because information technology's 50/100.
But the other 50 pieces of fruit can't perhaps exist included because they're limes, non lemons. And then the right math is 50/50, which ways 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the correct answer.
In this science paper, they are using 827 equally the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the 3rd trimester, which is long by the fourth dimension window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since significant women aren't fourth dimension travelers, they can't go back in time and report a spontaneous ballgame from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists either tin't exercise this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the globe with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then "science" has already failed its core promise: to offer "testify-based" conclusions to understand the globe effectually us.
Even so when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the commencement 20 weeks, these scientists falsely merits the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.6%. Why? Because they're covering upward the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.
In fact, the central author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro brand the same error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no pregnant run a risk of adverse events? For case, here's another study he co-authored: "Agin events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."
That study ended, "Review of VAERS reports did non place whatever new or unexpected condom concerns later on TIV-ID."
But is that decision based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Peradventure this aforementioned report architect has made the aforementioned systematic mistake (or mayhap a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. Information technology wouldn't be the showtime fourth dimension one author was found to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.
And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how scientific discipline progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can't only accept bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.
Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough
In the mean time, information technology'south clear that 4 out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the get-go twenty weeks (at least, co-ordinate to the small information ready we take so far). And that ways the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.
Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine fasten proteins directly attack reproductive organs such every bit the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in significant women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of ii medical journals. Although he does non characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking significant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You can hear him in his own words in the following interview:
Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97
All this means that alive births may plummet past 3.2 million over the side by side year, in the Usa alone, if every meaning woman is vaccinated during the start 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being chosen a medical "atrocity."
The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are at present killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with fasten poly peptide bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.
The vaccine manufacture is at state of war with the human race. And alive-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's land direction arbiter once characterized man children as an "environmental gamble."
This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes confronting humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the unabridged human race past the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated past a want to aid humanity, but are now clearly shown to be working towards humanity's destruction.
Larn more in today's mind-opening State of affairs Update podcast:
Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1
Hear a new podcast each weekday at:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html